InicioInformaciónDescargasContactoDonativos
Búsqueda


Archivos por Mes

mayo, 2013

abril, 2013

marzo, 2013

febrero, 2013

diciembre, 2012

noviembre, 2012

octubre, 2012

septiembre, 2012

agosto, 2012

julio, 2012

junio, 2012

mayo, 2012

abril, 2012

marzo, 2012

febrero, 2012

enero, 2012

diciembre, 2011

noviembre, 2011

octubre, 2011

septiembre, 2011

agosto, 2011

julio, 2011

junio, 2011

mayo, 2011

abril, 2011

marzo, 2011

febrero, 2011

enero, 2011

diciembre, 2010

noviembre, 2010

octubre, 2010

septiembre, 2010

agosto, 2010

julio, 2010

junio, 2010

mayo, 2010

abril, 2010

marzo, 2010

febrero, 2010

enero, 2010

diciembre, 2009

noviembre, 2009

octubre, 2009

septiembre, 2009

agosto, 2009

julio, 2009

junio, 2009

mayo, 2009

abril, 2009

marzo, 2009

febrero, 2009

Statement of Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez at the U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources
Publicado el 24 de junio de 2009

Download Letter to the Hon. Nancy Pelosi (Descargar la carta a la Hon. Nancy Pelosi) (.pdf)

I appreciate the opportunity to offer my views on this latest effort to discuss the future of Puerto Rico, H.R. 2499, The Puerto Rico Democracy Act of 2009, and to clarify what is truly at stake here.

If this was not such an important issue for eight million Puerto Ricans, I would say that this debate is worthy of a Shakespearean line such as, “Once more unto the breach, dear friends.” One would think that since Congress has been talking about Puerto Rico since the end of the 19th century, this body would have found the proper way to finish this debate in the 21st century. Unfortunately, it seems we have not.

I could have begun my statement by stating my opposition to H.R. 2499 because of previous determinations that this approach is unfair to the people of Puerto Rico. I could have further told you that as of today, none of the three members of Puerto Rican decent with constituencies in New York City and Chicago support this bill. And, lastly, I could have reminded members that previous legislative efforts that were deemed biased or un-inclusive have never succeeded.

However, for todayÂ’s hearing, these arguments may not be enough to sway well-
intentioned people to think calmly about what we are debating today: Puerto Rico and its people. We are not debating a mere vote. This debate is about whether the people of Puerto Rico are ready to join us as a full partner of this Union and what sort of partner we want. It is about allowing them to decide whether or not to go on their own and what that would mean to every Puerto Rican. It is also a debate about what other options may be worthy of consideration. Whatever decision is made by them, it must be one that is made knowingly and willingly. This is essential, for any status-changing decision will not be an easy one. That decision must be taken with a clear understanding of the consequences and with the determined commitment to carry it forward.

A bill drafted without consensus will always be under suspicion by a large segment of the population in Puerto Rico and, therefore, lack legitimacy. For Congress to push forward such an initiative ignores the historic words and the lessons from Lincoln’s time, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” How do we expect to find a solution to this Puerto Rico issue if we give merit to proposals that promote and foment mistrusts and divisions?

The issue here that makes this legislation unacceptable was present in its previous
incarnations in the 104th, 105th, 109th & 110th Congresses – the process. The process promoted by those bills has been perceived to be skewed in one form or another. It is now time to break this cycle. Thomas Paine once wrote, “A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right.” This bill is not right and we should begin investing Congress’ time in doing what is right.

We can not sanction this insistence in keeping a people blinded to facts, deaf to analysis and muted from expressing their opinions on what is being bargained, supposedly on their behalf. It is time to try a new approach to resolve this issue in a manner that does not allow one side to shut other positions out of the process. Lack of consensus equals lack of legitimacy.

I have advocated that a Constitutional Convention is an appropriate option, but it is not the only open process and I believe there can be other options that have not been discussed. However, any fair and transparent process must allow for hearings to be conducted in Puerto Rico and include the Puerto Rican community in the States in the self-determination process. It is my deepest conviction that a true democratic path to self-determination for the people of Puerto Rico must be forged first by Puerto Ricans; and it is up to them to decide what their options are for the future.

President Obama fully understands the difficulty of this issue and has indicated his
willingness to be engaged. This President deserves to have the opportunity to take a look at this issue and formulate proposals on how to move forward. I suggest that this Committee afford the President the opportunity to act and seek the expertise of this committee as well as other stakeholders. I look forward to working with the Obama Administration and the Committee in providing the people of Puerto Rico with an approach that guarantees a true expression of their wishes. Thank you.

 

Comentarios
comments powered by Disqus [Valid RSS]